Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

by July 3, 2025
July 3, 2025
Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court on Wednesday, seeking to overturn lower court rulings that blocked the administration from firing three Biden-appointed regulators.

The emergency appeal asks the High Court to allow the Trump administration to fire three members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), a five-member independent regulatory board that sets standards and oversees safety for thousands of consumer products. The appeal comes after the Supreme Court, in May, granted a separate emergency appeal request from the Trump administration pertaining to the firing of two Biden-appointed agency officials from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).  

‘It’s outrageous that we must once again seek Supreme Court intervention because rogue leftist judges in lower courts continue to defy the high court’s clear rulings,’ said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields. 

‘The Supreme Court decisively upheld the president’s constitutional authority to fire and remove executive officers exercising his power, yet this ongoing assault by activist judges undermines that victory,’ he continued. ‘President Trump remains committed to fulfilling the American people’s mandate by effectively leading the executive branch, despite these relentless obstructions.’

Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. were appointed to serve seven-year terms on the independent government agency by former President Joe Biden. Their positions have historically been protected from retribution, as they can only be terminated for neglect or malfeasance.

After Trump attempted to fire the three Democratic regulators, they sued, arguing the president sought to remove them without due cause. Eventually, a federal judge in Maryland agreed with them, and this week an appeals court upheld that ruling. 

However, according to the emergency appeal from the Trump administration, submitted to the High Court on Wednesday morning, the three regulators in question have shown ‘hostility to the President’s agenda’ and taken actions that have ‘thrown the agency into chaos.’

The emergency appeal to the Supreme Court added that ‘none of this should be possible’ after the High Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s decision to fire two executive branch labor relations officials.

‘None of this should be possible after Wilcox, which squarely controls this case. Like the NLRB and MSPB in Wilcox, the CPSC exercises ‘considerable executive power,’ 145 S. Ct. at 1415—for instance, by issuing rules, adjudicating administrative proceedings, issuing subpoenas, bringing enforcement suits seeking civil penalties, and (with the concurrence of the Attorney General) even prosecuting criminal cases,’ Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in the emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.

The request, according to Politico, will go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who is in charge of emergency appeals stemming from the appeals court that upheld the previous Maryland court ruling blocking the Trump administration’s firings.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash ‘colossal mistake’ shuttering USAID
next post
House advances Trump’s massive agenda bill after fiscal hawks cave

Related Posts

Hillary Clinton swipes Democrats, gives Republicans ‘credit’: ‘Nothing...

May 26, 2024

Biden admin officials noticed stamina issues in president’s...

December 19, 2024

Trump order targeting law firm WilmerHale blocked as...

May 28, 2025

‘Damn right’: Liz Cheney’s past USAID employment faces...

February 6, 2025

Trump admin urged to probe allegations pro-Hamas college...

March 27, 2025

Who is Pam Bondi, Trump’s new pick for...

November 23, 2024

Trump picks Miami-Dade County Commissioner Kevin Marino Cabrera...

December 26, 2024

5 recent gaffes by President Biden

June 6, 2024

Here’s what too many federal agencies don’t understand...

June 27, 2024

New House Freedom Caucus chair reveals GOP rebel...

September 18, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • White House reveals highest-paid staffers–and 8 taking no salaries

      July 3, 2025
    • Trump $3.3T megabill sets House record for longest vote in history

      July 3, 2025
    • Omaha city councilman mounts bid to succeed outgoing House Republican Rep. Don Bacon

      July 3, 2025
    • Microsoft laying off about 9,000 employees in latest round of cuts

      July 3, 2025
    • House advances Trump’s massive agenda bill after fiscal hawks cave

      July 3, 2025
    • Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

      July 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,293)
    • Politics (6,260)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (460)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved