Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

Federal judge blocks Trump admin from firing 2 Dem members of privacy oversight board

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025
Federal judge blocks Trump admin from firing 2 Dem members of privacy oversight board

A federal judge blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from firing two Democratic members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board on Wednesday.

Trump fired all three Democratic members of the five-person board in February, resulting in two of them filing a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton found that allowing unilateral firings would prevent the board from carrying out its purpose.

Walton wrote that allowing at-will removals would make the board ‘beholden to the very authority it is supposed to oversee on behalf of Congress and the American people.’

The oversight board was initially created by Congress to ensure that federal counterterrorism policies were in line with privacy and civil liberties law.

‘To hold otherwise would be to bless the President’s obvious attempt to exercise power beyond that granted to him by the Constitution and shield the Executive Branch’s counterterrorism actions from independent oversight, public scrutiny, and bipartisan congressional insight regarding those actions,’ Walton wrote.

Trump’s firings left just one Republican on the board. The third Democratic member had just two days left in her term when she was removed, and she did not sue the administration.

Should judges be allowed to issue injunctions against presidents?

The two plaintiffs, Travis LeBlanc and Edward Felten, argued in their lawsuit that members of the board cannot be fired without cause. Meanwhile, lawyers for Trump’s administration argued that members of other congressionally created boards do have explicit job protections, and it would therefore be wrong for Walton to create such protections where they are absent.

‘The Constitution gives President Trump the power to remove personnel who exercise his executive authority,’ White House spokesman Harrison Fields told the Associated Press. ‘The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue.’

The plaintiffs also argued that their firings left just one member on the board, a Republican, and that falls short of the quorum required for the board to function.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
WATCH: Rubio on Dems saying they regret voting for him: ‘Confirmation I’m doing a good job’
next post
Mike Johnson, Donald Trump get ‘big, ‘beautiful’ win as budget passes House

Related Posts

US still has no UN ambassador as world...

June 17, 2025

Benjamin Netanyahu comes to defense of Elon Musk:...

January 23, 2025

Secret Service Director Cheatle resigns after mounting pressure...

July 23, 2024

Israel takes hard line against terrorists, allowing deportation...

November 7, 2024

DAVID MARCUS: Why Teamsters members think Trump, not...

September 18, 2024

War torn regions have keen interest in US...

October 30, 2024

DOJ lands legal victory as federal judge allows...

July 9, 2025

Trump DOJ investigating Biden-era pardons amid concerns over...

June 3, 2025

Harris campaign silent on House bill banning contracts...

September 12, 2024

Abortion ‘on the ballot’ in 10 states this...

November 5, 2024

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • Cracker Barrel CEO serves up leftover corporate branding to unhappy customers

      August 23, 2025
    • GOP senators push Kamala Harris testimony as House Oversight eyes subpoena

      August 23, 2025
    • 10 key takeaways from DOJ’s release of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Epstein interviews

      August 23, 2025
    • Jackson’s scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues after high-profile ruling

      August 23, 2025
    • Trump DOJ releases ‘thousands’ of Epstein files to House Oversight Committee

      August 22, 2025
    • Jackson scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues after high-profile ruling

      August 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,357)
    • Politics (6,829)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (461)
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved