Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January 6 agent list amid fears of retaliation

by February 7, 2025
February 7, 2025
FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January 6 agent list amid fears of retaliation

The Justice Department and a group of FBI agents reached an agreement in federal court Friday over the dissemination of information about FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation.

According to the text of the deal, the Trump administration cannot release information about the FBI agents who investigated the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot without giving plaintiffs at least two days’ notice so that the matter can be considered again in federal court.

It does not, however, place such a time limit on the dissemination of agents’ identities to other government agencies or the White House. 

The deal resolves, at least for now, a dispute over the release of information that agents said they feared could be used for retaliation or leaked to the public.

 

The agreement comes after active FBI agents and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association, a voluntary agents’ group, sued the Justice Department earlier this week seeking to block the release of any identifying information about FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations.

The two parties tussled for hours in court on Thursday in front of U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, who questioned both parties at length on the nature of DOJ’s questionnaire, the potential for disclosures or retaliation and how the Justice Department intends to use information divulged in the questionnaires.

The agreement defers any immediate relief for plaintiffs, pushing to March 27 their hearing for a preliminary injunction. 

Cobb previously granted the two parties a brief administrative stay on Thursday evening, saying that if the information was released she believed it ‘would put FBI agents in immediate danger.’

The agreement comes just days after FBI leadership said it had provided the Justice Department with a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 investigations and criminal cases, in keeping with an earlier deadline set by U.S. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.

‘Plaintiffs assert that the purpose for this list is to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer other adverse employment action,’ lawyers for the FBI agents said, adding that they ‘reasonably fear that all or parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.’

Lawyers for the agents argued that any effort to review or discriminate against agents involved in the investigation would be ‘unlawful and retaliatory,’ and a violation of civil service protections under federal law.

They also cited ‘profound concern’ that the list of thousands of FBI agents involved would be leaked to the public, threatening their safety. 

Meanwhile, lawyers for the Justice Department stressed that their intent in issuing the questionnaire was to conduct an ‘internal review’ of activities in the Jan. 6 probe, not to punish individuals for carrying out orders. 

Bove also sought to emphasize this message in an all-staff email to FBI personnel earlier this week. In the email, Bove stressed that the questionnaire was not intended to be a first step to mass layoffs, and stressed it was simply intended for review.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Deadline looms for release of JFK assassination files
next post
Trump to sign executive order establishing White House faith office

Related Posts

RFK Jr. claims to have enough signatures to...

August 10, 2024

Biden interview audio reveals who brought up Beau’s...

May 17, 2025

Karoline Leavitt explains US efforts to negotiate with...

March 5, 2025

‘Unfit to lead’: Blue state governor lashes out...

February 1, 2025

Stampede, gunfire at Gaza humanitarian aid delivery kills...

March 1, 2024

‘Let us be the parents’: Supreme Court should...

April 22, 2025

Trump-backed bills targeting activist judges, noncitizen voting head...

April 1, 2025

Trump’s Defense pick goes on offense as support...

December 10, 2024

Controversial office vacant for first time in nearly...

May 21, 2025

JD Vance says Trump clashed with former officials...

October 27, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • White House stands by tax bill after Musk calls it a ‘disgusting abomination’

      June 3, 2025
    • South Korea flips left in presidential race; Lee secures victory after conservative opponent concedes

      June 3, 2025
    • Trump and Melania to headline power-player packed Kennedy Center opening night

      June 3, 2025
    • Uber delivery chief Gore-Coty is leaving after almost 13 years at ride-hailing company

      June 3, 2025
    • Elon Musk’s Neuralink raises $650 million in fresh capital

      June 3, 2025
    • House Dems urge GOP to condemn DHS for handcuffing Rep Nadler staffer, order Noem to testify

      June 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,241)
    • Politics (5,816)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (457)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved