Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
previous post
It’s been a long time Mr Bear, where have you been?
next post
It’s official: Vice President Kamala Harris goes over the top and clinches Democratic presidential nomination

Related Posts

Tesla recalls 1.8 million vehicles over unlatched hood...

July 30, 2024

People are earning more from side gigs and...

July 11, 2024

Amazon AI scammers duped investors out of millions...

March 19, 2025

Stellantis aims to correct ‘arrogant’ mistakes in U.S....

June 17, 2024

Summer Fridays are on the decline — companies...

June 17, 2024

CVS is under pressure and considering a breakup....

October 5, 2024

Prebiotic soda brand Olipop valued at $1.85 billion...

February 13, 2025

Trump could scale back Canada, Mexico tariffs Wednesday,...

March 5, 2025

Is it time to rethink the 4% retirement...

May 15, 2024

Netflix inks deal to stream its first NFL...

May 16, 2024

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • From admiration to Alaska: A timeline of Trump and Putin’s high-stakes encounters

      August 15, 2025
    • Schumer claims Trump admin withholding Epstein files, threatens to sue

      August 15, 2025
    • The CEO in chief: How Trump is getting what he wants from big business

      August 15, 2025
    • American history won’t be displayed ‘in a woke manner’ at Smithsonian, Trump says

      August 15, 2025
    • Ulta and Target will end deal for in-store beauty shops next year

      August 15, 2025
    • Armenia and Azerbaijan leaders seek to ease Russian and Iranian concerns after US-brokered peace deal

      August 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,347)
    • Politics (6,748)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (461)
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved