Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

Senate shuts down Kaine’s attempt to check Trump’s war powers

by June 28, 2025
June 28, 2025
Senate shuts down Kaine’s attempt to check Trump’s war powers

A Senate Democrat’s push to put a check on President Donald Trump’s powers and reaffirm the Senate’s war authority was shut down by lawmakers in the upper chamber Thursday.

Sen. Tim Kaine’s war powers resolution, which would have required Congress to debate and vote on whether the president could declare war, or strike Iran, was struck down in the Senate on a largely party-line vote, save for Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., a staunch advocate of Israel who supported Trump’s strike on the Islamic Republic, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been vocal in his thoughts about congressional war powers in recent days.

Earlier in the week, the Virginia Democrat vowed to move ahead with the resolution despite a fragile ceasefire brokered between Israel and Iran following weekend strikes on the Islamic Republic’s key nuclear facilities that were not given the green-light by Congress.

Kaine argued that the ceasefire gave his resolution more credence and breathing room to properly debate the role that Congress plays when it comes to authorizing both war and attacks abroad.

He said ahead of the vote on the Senate floor that he came to Washington to ensure that the country does not again get into another ‘unnecessary’ war, and invoked the rush to approve war powers for President George W. Bush over two decades ago to engage with Iraq.

‘I think the events of this week have demonstrated that war is too big to consign to the decisions of any one person,’ Kaine said. 

Indeed, his resolution became a focal point for a debate that has raged on Capitol Hill since Israel began its bombing campaign against Iran: whether the strikes like those carried out during Operation Midnight Hammer constituted an act of war that required congressional approval, or if Trump’s decision was under his constitutional authority as commander in chief.  

Senate Republicans have widely argued that Trump was well within his purview, while most Senate Democrats raised constitutional concerns about the president’s ability to carry out a strike without lawmakers weighing in. 

Experts have argued, too, that Trump was within his executive authority to strike Iran. 

The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the White House, giving lawmakers the sole power to declare war, while the president acts as the commander in chief directing the military. 

And nearly two centuries later, at the height of the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 was born, which sought to further define those roles.

But the most impact lawmakers could have is through the power of the purse, and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who plays a large role in controlling the purse strings as the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, had a sharp message against Kaine’s resolution. 

McConnell used instances where Democratic presidents over the last three decades have used their authority for limited engagements in Kosovo, Libya, Syria and Yemen, and questioned why ‘isolationists’ would consider the strike on Iran to kneecap its nuclear program a mistake. 

‘I have not heard the frequent flyers on War Powers resolutions reckon seriously with these questions,’ he said. ‘Until they do, efforts like this will remain divorced from both strategic and constitutional reality.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Trump touts administration’s progress on peace deals, says world leaders ‘respect our country again’
next post
Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces Republican family feud as Senate reveals its final text

Related Posts

FBI flooded with record number of new agent...

April 2, 2025

Fetterman still enthusiastically supportive of Stefanik for US...

December 12, 2024

Disputed DOD nominee is ‘best person’ to implement...

February 20, 2025

Pompeo doesn’t rule out serving in second Trump...

March 9, 2024

Harris claimed Biden was completely fit to continue...

July 29, 2024

What to expect as Republicans try to salvage...

December 19, 2024

State Department says Ukraine ready to accept 30-day...

March 17, 2025

Panama eliminates charge fees for U.S. government vessels...

February 6, 2025

Johnson says House will ‘apply every amount of...

March 15, 2024

Which social media platforms have banned Trump and...

August 5, 2024

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • Armenia and Azerbaijan leaders seek to ease Russian and Iranian concerns after US-brokered peace deal

      August 14, 2025
    • Social Security is 90 years old. We are making it smarter, better, faster under Trump

      August 14, 2025
    • Trump admin unveils groundbreaking tool ‘supercharging’ gov’t efficiency to ‘win the race’ for AI dominance

      August 14, 2025
    • DNC rips JD Vance for fishing with British foreign secretary in latest bizarre attack; Republicans hit back

      August 13, 2025
    • Vance: Adversaries are ‘afraid’ of US military, and that makes tough talks like Putin possible

      August 13, 2025
    • Trump threatens ‘very severe’ consequences if Russia doesn’t agree to end Ukraine war

      August 13, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,345)
    • Politics (6,745)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (461)
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved