Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

Israeli ministers frustrated over US, IDF leak on Lebanon operation: Report

by October 1, 2024
October 1, 2024
Israeli ministers frustrated over US, IDF leak on Lebanon operation: Report

Ministers in Israel’s Political-Security Cabinet in the early hours of Tuesday morning local time agreed on an operational strategy for Israel’s ‘limited’ invasion into Lebanon, but tensions were high after officials were reportedly frustrated that the news of the operation had been leaked hours before they even met.  

An unnamed U.S. security official confirmed to Fox News and other outlets Monday morning that a ‘limited’ invasion into Lebanon was imminent. And when questioned by reporters on it later, President Biden appeared to confirm the claims and said, ‘I’m more aware than you might know.’

But when asked if he was comfortable with the operational plans, he said, ‘I’m comfortable with them stopping. We should have a cease-fire now.’

Similarly, during a U.S. State Department briefing later in the day, spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters, ‘They have been informing us about a number of operations.’ 

‘They have, at this time, told us that those are limited operations focused on Hezbollah infrastructure near the border. But we’re in continuous conversations with them about it,’ he added.

It is unclear if Miller was speaking about future operations or ongoing operations as reports surfaced earlier on Monday suggesting that Israeli special forces had been engaging in cross-border raids for months.

Fox News Digital could not confirm which Israeli ministers were frustrated and specifically who in the U.S. their ire was directed at. 

But it wasn’t only U.S. officials the Israeli ministers were reportedly frustrated with, according to local media outlet YNET News.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were also a source of exasperation after a spokesperson for the IDF reportedly referenced the operation ahead of the minister’s debate, though local reporting appeared to have been updated following requests by IDF spokesman Rear Adm.  Daniel Hagari, who called on outlets not to report on ‘rumors.’

‘In recent hours there have been many reports and rumors about IDF activity on the Lebanese border. We ask that no reports be circulated about the activities of the forces,’ Hagari said on X ahead of the ministerial meeting. 

‘Stick to the official reports only and do not spread irresponsible rumors,’ he added. 

However, following the meeting, the IDF released a statement confirming that the IDF had begun ‘limited, localized, and targeted ground raids based on precise intelligence against Hezbollah terrorist targets and infrastructure in southern Lebanon.’

‘These targets are located in villages close to the border and pose an immediate threat to Israeli communities in northern Israel,’ the IDF added. 

Sources told Fox News earlier on Monday that the operation was set to be ‘limited’ in scope and would be quicker than the 2006 operation Israel conducted in Lebanon, which lasted 34 days and saw some 1,191 deaths and 4,409 injured, a third of which were women and children. Israel also reported that 43 civilians were killed and 997 were injured.

Axios previously reported that Israel did not give the U.S. advance notice on the exploding beepers operation, reporting, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant called Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin as the pagers started to explode in Lebanon. Following the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah on Friday, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin told reporters, ‘The United States was not involved in Israel’s operation,’ noting there was ‘no advance warning’ from the Israelis.

The State Department did not immediately return Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to how the VP debate is sometimes more memorable than the presidential debates
next post
Heightened ‘significance and importance’ as Vance, Walz face-off in VP debate

Related Posts

‘Ridiculous’: Bondi personally strips DOJ walls of Biden,...

February 12, 2025

Venezuela’s Maduro faces political meltdown: Rivals claim election...

July 30, 2024

Senate Republicans eye changes to Trump’s megabill after...

June 1, 2025

Women for Trump, Goya team up to provide...

October 7, 2024

Fate of Trump’s $9.4 billion spending cut package...

June 12, 2025

‘Putrid’ DNC antisemitism denounced by counterprotester who says...

August 20, 2024

Jimmy Carter nears the top of America’s ‘Most...

December 30, 2024

Number of injunctions halting Trump policies trounces predecessors...

March 17, 2025

Department of Justice freezes all civil rights division...

January 23, 2025

Weiss Report: Hunter’s drug use can’t explain away...

January 14, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • Trump to meet with Netanyahu as he pushes for ceasefire between Israel, Gaza

      July 1, 2025
    • Elon Musk claims of ‘pork’ in bill not even possible, Budget chair says

      July 1, 2025
    • Trump urges House Republicans to ignore ‘grandstanders’ and deliver his ‘big, beautiful bill’ by July 4

      July 1, 2025
    • Lululemon sues Costco over selling alleged dupes

      July 1, 2025
    • Schumer forces name change for ‘big, beautiful bill’ moments before it passes

      July 1, 2025
    • ‘Only the beginning’: Trump admin releases data showing federal workforce slashed since January

      July 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,290)
    • Politics (6,242)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (460)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved