Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

Freedom Caucus draws first battle lines in election year government shutdown fight

by August 12, 2024
August 12, 2024
Freedom Caucus draws first battle lines in election year government shutdown fight

The ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus is signaling it will not help Congress avoid a government shutdown next month unless a short-term spending bill is linked to a bill requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

The House GOP rebels are also calling for a short-term spending plan to extend until the new year, at which point allies of former President Trump hope he will be in the White House again. 

That puts the group in direct opposition to their more traditional GOP colleagues, including House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., who suggested last month that he would want to finish the government funding process by the end of 2024.

With just six of 12 individual appropriations bills having passed the House, and none yet in the Senate, it is all but certain that a short-term extension of the current year’s funding levels will be needed to keep the government open past the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30.

Even senior Republicans like Cole have admitted that a short-term bill, known as a continuing resolution (CR), will be needed to avoid federal offices shuttering and potentially thousands of federal employees getting furloughed. However, the Monday morning House Freedom Caucus statement, released while lawmakers are in the middle of a six-week-long recess from Washington, shows the beginnings of a potentially messy fiscal fight.

In a new statement obtained by Fox News Digital, the House Freedom Caucus said that ‘House Republicans should return to Washington to continue the work of passing all 12 appropriations bills to cut spending and advance our policy priorities … If unsuccessful, in the inevitability that Congress considers a Continuing Resolution, government funding should be extended into early 2025 to avoid a lame duck omnibus that preserves Democrat spending and policies well into the next administration.’

‘Furthermore, the Continuing Resolution should include the SAVE Act – as called for by President Trump – to prevent non-citizens from voting to preserve free and fair elections in light of the millions of illegal aliens imported by the Biden-Harris administration over.’

The House passed the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act last month with five Democrats voting with every single House Republican in passing the bill. 

However, it is opposed by the White House and likely will not get a vote in the Democratically-held Senate, meaning its inclusion in a final CR would be fighting an uphill battle.

Cole told reporters last month that he would prefer something with wider bipartisan appeal, like supplemental disaster relief funding, to be attached to a CR instead.

‘I haven’t really thought about it yet, it’s not a big deal to me. But again, if it can’t pass the Senate, it isn’t going to be an effective CR,’ Cole said when asked about the SAVE Act. ‘So a real CR, you know, I’m more interested actually in disaster relief. That’s something that I think the two sides can come together on.’

The 118th Congress has seen historic levels of discord over the issue of government spending, with GOP rebels clamoring for House Republican leadership to wield their razor-thin majority to force through conservative policy priorities or risk a shutdown. 

However, leaders on both sides have signaled that they want to avoid the political ramifications of a shutdown, especially one this close to the November election. 

Last year’s spending fight saw the ouster of ex-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., by a handful of his own GOP colleagues after he helped pass a ‘clean’ short-term funding extension in September of last year.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Exclusive: Hamas document reveals devious paraglider terrorism attack plan
next post
Biden-Harris appeasement didn’t delay Iran retaliation against Israel. Here’s what really happened

Related Posts

SCOOP: House Freedom Caucus draws battle lines as...

June 2, 2025

House balance of power still undecided a week...

November 12, 2024

‘I’ve never seen this’: Top Republican details level of Secret...

September 19, 2024

‘Crush liberal dominance’: Conservative funder urges leaner, meaner...

September 15, 2024

NIH director, after Trump nominates RFK Jr. for...

November 19, 2024

Trump, lawmakers react after ‘big, beautiful bill’ clears...

June 29, 2025

Tight-lipped House Dems still divided on Biden, leave...

July 10, 2024

Failed VP candidate Tim Walz skewered after hinting...

March 4, 2025

Greene calls for yanking FDA approval of COVID-19...

March 21, 2025

Russian border states eye exit of landmine treaty...

March 13, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • 4 Senate amendments to Trump megabill that failed — and 1 that passed

      July 1, 2025
    • Pope, State Department condemn latest massacre of Christians by Islamist militants in Nigeria

      July 1, 2025
    • Dems vow to fight ‘tooth and nail’ as Supreme Court takes up campaign finance case

      July 1, 2025
    • Google makes first foray into fusion in venture with MIT spinoff Commonwealth Fusion Systems

      July 1, 2025
    • Trump’s achievements embolden him to be even more aggressive

      July 1, 2025
    • Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

      July 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,288)
    • Politics (6,222)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (460)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved