Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
previous post
It’s been a long time Mr Bear, where have you been?
next post
It’s official: Vice President Kamala Harris goes over the top and clinches Democratic presidential nomination

Related Posts

Some consumers are punting big purchases like pools...

May 19, 2024

Applebee’s owner plots turnaround to lure back fast-food...

May 10, 2024

Affirm announces JPMorgan Chase merchants can now offer...

March 26, 2025

Here’s why banks don’t want the CFPB to...

March 10, 2025

Sam Altman rejoins OpenAI board of directors, months...

March 9, 2024

Trump tariffs, tax cuts and interest rates likely...

May 2, 2024

Boeing factory workers strike after overwhelmingly rejecting contract

September 15, 2024

Weekly mortgage refinance demand soars 16% as rates...

August 7, 2024

Former MGM Grand casino president to be sentenced...

May 9, 2024

GM lays off 1,000 employees amid reorganization and...

November 16, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • Biden struggles with words, key memories in leaked audio from Special Counsel Hur interview

      May 17, 2025
    • Former FBI Director James Comey meets with Secret Service after controversial ’86 47′ post

      May 16, 2025
    • UN said to be stalling reforms in hopes Democrats flip House in midterm elections

      May 16, 2025
    • Cava revenue beats estimates as Mediterranean chain reports double-digit same-store sales growth

      May 16, 2025
    • FLASHBACK: Comey had another anti-Trump seashell photo moment during 2024 election

      May 16, 2025
    • New House GOP resolution eviscerates Comey over ’86 47′ Instagram post

      May 16, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,216)
    • Politics (5,575)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (455)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved