Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

World News

Arizona’s top court revives 19th century abortion ban

by April 10, 2024
April 10, 2024
Arizona’s top court revives 19th century abortion ban

Arizona’s top court on Tuesday revived a ban on nearly all abortions under a law from 1864, a half century before statehood and women’s suffrage, further restricting reproductive rights in a state where terminating a pregnancy was already barred at 15 weeks of gestation.

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled 4-2 in favor of an anti-abortion obstetrician and a county prosecutor who pressed to implement the Civil War-era statute after the Democratic attorney general of the key presidential battleground state declined to do so.

States were given the go-ahead to adopt such bans after the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court in June 2022 overturned its landmark 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade that had made access to abortion a constitutional right nationwide.

Arizona Justice John Lopez, who like all of the state Supreme Court’s members was appointed by a Republican governor, wrote that the state’s legislature “has never affirmatively created a right to, or independently authorized, elective abortion.”

“We defer, as we are constitutionally obligated to do, to the legislature’s judgment, which is accountable to, and thus reflects, the mutable will of our citizens,” Lopez wrote.

The state high court ruled the 19th century law could be enforced prospectively. But it stayed implementation of its decision for 14 days to allow the parties to raise any remaining issues at the trial-court level.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, in a statement called the ruling “unconscionable and an affront to freedom,” and stressed that she would not prosecute any doctor or woman under the “draconian law.”

“Today’s decision to reimpose a law from a time when Arizona wasn’t a state, the Civil War was raging, and women couldn’t even vote will go down in history as a stain on our state,” she said.

Planned Parenthood Arizona, which offers abortions at its clinics in the state, said it would continue to provide those services “for a short period of time” under a 2022 state court order barring immediate enforcement of the 1864 law.

That injunction, according to the organization, remains in effect until 45 days after the state Supreme Court formally issues its ruling, which typically takes a number of weeks.

While Mayes said she would not enforce the law, local prosecutors could. One, Republican Yavapai County Attorney Dennis McGrane, intervened in the litigation to argue in favor of the 1864 statute. He was joined by obstetrician Eric Hazelrigg, who runs a network of pregnancy centers that counsel against abortion.

Tuesday’s decision marked the latest legal setback for U.S. abortion rights, following a ruling last week by the Florida Supreme Court that cleared the way for a Republican-backed law banning abortion after six weeks of pregnancy to take effect.

President Joe Biden, a Democrat whose re-election bid is widely seen as gaining from a backlash to new abortion restrictions since Roe was overturned, called the Arizona ruling the “result of the extreme agenda of Republican elected officials who are committed to ripping away women’s freedom.”

“Millions of Arizonans will soon live under an even more extreme and dangerous abortion ban, which fails to protect women even when their health is at risk or in tragic cases of rape or incest,” he said in a statement.

California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said on the social media platform X that his neighboring state “remains ready to help Arizonans access reproductive health care.”

VOTERS MAY DECIDE
Fourteen other states have banned nearly all abortions since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Monday said access to abortion should be determined by the states, and stopped short of proposing a national ban that could imperil his chances with voters in swing states like Arizona in the November election.

Asked if Trump’s campaign had any response to Tuesday’s ruling, a spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, said in a statement the former president “could not have been more clear. These are decisions for people of each state to make.”

In Arizona, the issue could ultimately be decided by the voters, after a group of abortion rights advocates last week said it gathered enough signatures to create a November ballot measure that would enshrine in the state’s constitution a right to an abortion until fetal viability.

Abortion rights measures have prevailed everywhere they have been on the ballot since the Supreme Court’s decision.

Planned Parenthood sued the state in 1971 to challenge the 1864 law, which banned abortions except to save a woman’s life and imposed up to five years in prison on anyone performing an abortion.

A judge ruled in Planned Parenthood’s favor and issued an order blocking the law following the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.

In September 2022, after Roe was overturned, a court granted a request filed by the then-Republican attorney general to allow prosecutors to enforce the 1864 ban, but a state appellate court once again blocked it.

Vice Chief Justice Ann Timmer, in an opinion joined by Chief Justice Robert Brutinel, dissented from Tuesday’s ruling, saying if the legislature had intended for the near-total abortion ban to take effect, it could have done so during its 2023 session.

“I would leave it to the people and the legislature to determine Arizona’s course in the wake of Roe’s demise,” she wrote. — Reuters

previous post
Takeaways from the Swiss women’s climate victory
next post
Is the Banking System on the Verge of Systemic Implosion? What to Look Out For

Related Posts

Sheinbaum poised to be Mexico’s 1st female president

June 3, 2024

US Supreme Court lets Texas border enforcement law...

March 20, 2024

Weak Asian factories take shine off China’s rebound

April 1, 2024

China’s top legislators pledge to safeguard sovereignty, security...

March 8, 2024

OPEC+ could delay output hike, sources say

November 29, 2024

TV polls show Harris gaining ground on Trump

September 23, 2024

Trump calls TikTok a threat but says some...

March 12, 2024

IMF’s Georgieva interested in second term as fund’s...

March 8, 2024

IMF board okays $880 million loan payment for...

March 22, 2024

Vietnam legislature approves resignation of president

March 21, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • Probe into Biden’s alleged mental decline cover-up deepens with more former White House officials to testify

      July 2, 2025
    • MAGA law group fights to expose how Biden’s DEI agenda may have tainted life-saving organ transplants

      July 2, 2025
    • Israel accepts Trump-led ceasefire plan that could end Gaza war within 60 days

      July 2, 2025
    • Trump to meet with Netanyahu as he pushes for ceasefire between Israel, Gaza

      July 1, 2025
    • Elon Musk claims of ‘pork’ in bill not even possible, Budget chair says

      July 1, 2025
    • Trump urges House Republicans to ignore ‘grandstanders’ and deliver his ‘big, beautiful bill’ by July 4

      July 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,290)
    • Politics (6,245)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (460)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved