Insiders Advisor
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • World News
  • Business
  • Politics

Insiders Advisor

Politics

McCaul threatens to hold Blinken in contempt of Congress for ‘withholding’ key Afghanistan documents

by February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
McCaul threatens to hold Blinken in contempt of Congress for ‘withholding’ key Afghanistan documents

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, is threatening to hold Secretary of State Antony Blinken in contempt of Congress, accusing him of failing to hand over key documents related to the U.S.’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

At the heart of the issue are interview notes that were used to put together the State Department’s After-Action Review (AAR) of the Afghanistan withdrawal.

‘The Committee’s patience has been exhausted, and it requires these files to complete its investigation and make legislative recommendations for this Congress to consider,’ McCaul wrote.

‘Should the Department fail to produce the… files outlined below by March 6, 2024, the Committee is prepared to hold you in contempt of Congress.’

He also accused Blinken of choosing ‘politics over policy’ with the State Department’s decision to ‘withhold’ the documents.

It’s notably harsh language for McCaul, whose relationship with Blinken is relatively more cordial than that of other House Republican committee chairs investigating the Biden administration.

In his letter, he noted multiple instances in which McCaul accused the department of stonewalling, including after he first requested notes from interviews with State officials taken by then-Ambassador Dan Smith, who led the AAR in September 2023. 

He also listed ways in which the committee sought to accommodate the department. For example, McCaul wrote that the committee offered to redact names and address security concerns after State officials told him providing the notes would have a ‘significant chilling effect on the Department’s ability to conduct thorough and impactful lessons learned efforts to improve our foreign policy-making.’

‘On November 28, 2023, the Committee once more requested the interview notes, stating that the Department had failed to produce any high-priority items in its last eight productions,’ the letter said. ‘For the next month, the Department stated the priority items requested, including the AAR team’s interview notes, ‘either belong to a third agency or implicate significant Executive Branch confidentiality interests.’’

When committee staff stressed that the documents were critical to the House’s probe, State officials responded that the decision was above their ‘paygrade,’ according to the letter.

‘The Department’s stated reasons for withholding the interview notes are not rooted in law and, in fact, contravene Congress’s constitutional and statutory oversight authority,’ McCaul wrote. ‘It is appalling that over two years after the deadly and chaotic withdrawal, the Department continues to choose politics over policy.’

The Afghanistan AAR placed blame on both the Trump and Biden administrations for the disastrous withdrawal in August 2021.

It said, ‘there was insufficient senior-level consideration of worst-case scenarios and how quickly those might follow.’

The report said President Biden’s decision to follow through with former President Donald Trump’s vow to withdraw troops from Afghanistan – and to set a Sept. 11 deadline for it – ultimately ‘compounded the difficulties the Department faced in mitigating the loss of the military’s key enablers.’

It was also critical of the Biden administration’s decision to hand over control of Bagram Air Base to the Afghan government, a decision that also earned Biden bipartisan condemnation from national security hawks.

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department about McCaul’s letter but did not immediately hear back.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Sen Hawley warns consulting firms against working with China to ‘undermine America’
next post
Biden admin faces bipartisan backlash for allowing beef imports from Paraguay: ‘Cutting corners’

Related Posts

Fox News Power Rankings: Five themes emerge in...

August 13, 2024

Feds open probe into RFK Jr for allegedly...

September 17, 2024

Trump’s first vice president urges his old boss...

May 9, 2025

US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of...

November 23, 2024

Trump, Biden nearly tied as general election kicks...

March 14, 2024

Trump admin removes Biden-era transportation safety board vice...

May 6, 2025

UN’s nuclear watchdog warns its unable to confirm...

June 9, 2025

Harris’ ‘mixed messages’ on natural gas production could...

October 24, 2024

House Democrats invite ex-Giuliani associate Lev Parnas as...

March 20, 2024

Trump could face renewed ISIS threat in Syria...

December 23, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Latest News

    • DOJ seizes record $225 million in crypto tied to global ‘pig butchering’ scams

      June 19, 2025
    • Vance defends Gabbard as ‘critical part’ of Trump team after president dismissed Iran nuke threat comments

      June 18, 2025
    • Amazon expects to cut corporate jobs as it relies more on AI

      June 18, 2025
    • Ilhan Omar claims no one has ‘attacked Americans,’ but Iran’s deadly history tells different story

      June 18, 2025
    • ‘Squad’ members, GOP lawmaker join forces to reject US involvement in Israel-Iran war

      June 18, 2025
    • GOP says Dems admit ‘guilt’ in Biden health cover-up by boycotting Senate hearing on ‘constitutional scandal’

      June 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,271)
    • Politics (6,026)
    • Stocks (904)
    • World News (458)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: insidersadvisor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 insidersadvisor.com | All Rights Reserved